The UI differences are sort of neither here nor there, although for my money, change is good. If you don’t find that useful, you can turn it off. It now comes with a pretty menu item which shows your drives and offers quick access repair/mounting/etc. It has some pretty looking tools and interfaces, although I don’t think they change much in a practical sense. Paragon has developed significantly since last year. That makes Paragon a pretty darn good deal.) What’s different?įeatures and interface.
( UPDATE: Originally, I thought the package suite was on SALE for $50, but I think that’s actually the normal price and $100 is what you’d pay if you bought each alone.
These factors make things a little less straightforward, but still I feel sum up in Tuxera’s favor. Winner: Tuxera. Except, there are some extenuating circumstances at the moment: Tuxera’s currently on sale for $18, and Paragon has released a package suite of drivers which includes free upgrades, and is $50. Tuxera still charges $31 for thiers, on a per-user basis with free upgrades to new versions. Paragon still charges $20 for their NTFS driver, licensed per-machine with no upgrades. Part of my plan for this machine going forward is to start running space-intense tasks like VMs and my photo library from an external NVMe SSD that can actually utilize that silly bandwidth, and may itself be shared with Windows 10 machines, so here we are. That almost includes some hypothetical external RAMdisk. Some things have changed – we’re on High Sierra looking to Mojave now, both drivers have new versions out, and this new machine now has not only USB 3.1 Gen2, but more generally, 160GBit/s I/O that could fully saturate virtually any storage device you could plug into it. I just bought a shiny new too-expensive-and-questionably-fit-for-sale MacBook Pro 2018, and the question is newly prescient. Last year, out of necessity to figure out which tool to use, I posted a comparison of Tuxera and Paragon NTFS drivers on macOS Sierra.
0 kommentar(er)
